How are you doing? I enjoy your Saturday morning stories. I have found a new author who I enjoy. Her name is Nancy Atherton, and she writes Aunt Dimity books, about an amateur detective who talks via an old journal to Aunt Dimity, who advises her from the great beyond. The books (14 in the series) are refreshing and fun.
Janet Berryman
Free book and great popcorn!
April 15, 2011To enter the drawing, click follow and then leave a comment on any post between Saturday the 16th of April and Saturday the 23. Note on the comment which book you want if you win. If you post a link to your facebook or twitter, you’ll receive a second entry. The winning comment will be randomly chosen by a third party. I’ll post the winner at 9;00 p.m. Eastern Daylight time. Check back to claim your prize!
Either book will make a great gift for Mother’s Day or Father’s Day! Good Luck!
(for some reason, several readers have said their comments didn’t post, but they did. Apparently Blogger doesn’t give good feedback to commenters, but in every case, I’ve been able to find and moderate them. Double check that your comment posted later in the day.
Here’s my Kettle Corn-like popcorn recipe
Get out a big serving bowl to receive popcorn. Heat 1/4 cup oil and 1 scant cup of popcorn in deep fry pan (or chicken fryer). Just when the first kernals pop, sprinkle with 1/3 cup sugar (I’ve tried white and brown and they both work.) and cover with a tight fitting lid. Shake pan over med-high heat until popping slows almost to a stop. Dump popcorn quickly into a big waiting bowl, Salt to taste, Let cool for a couple minutes or you’ll burn your fingers. Just TRY to eat only one handful!
Creationists, Darwinians and Darwinian Creationists.
April 13, 2011I am pretty good at reasoning and I’m pretty good at seeing the weaknesses in others’ reasoning. And before you fasten your box of opinions shut, we must all agree that there is only one truth. My opinion, or Darwin’s or Dr. Geologist or Dr. Anthropologist are all irrelevant to the truth. It stands alone, waiting to be discovered.
I also believe that God doesn’t do anything to confuse us. He is a God of truth and cannot lie. In fact he wants us to discover him through study and prayer. He has left his fingerprints everywhere in our beautiful world and is pleased when we learn and appreciate what he has given us.
I believe that the accounts of the creation in Christian and Hebrew Scripture (which in this aspect are the same) are very simplified explanations of how He did it. I have no problem with “The Big Bang” theory of matter because matter is merely light energy properly arranged. A sudden infusion of light energy in a place where there was room for a new Universe seems like the sensible way for a God of Light, whose power is light and truth, to start a new project. If radiometric dating says that happened 4 billion years ago, that’s okay with me. It was before time as we know it was measured and an Eternal God is not governed by time.
Then there’s the creation of life on the earth. The order given in the Bible puts plants, containing seed in themselves after their kind, first on the earth. This would be sensible to create the food before the creation of the hungry. “Seed in itself after his kind” doesn’t sound too much like evolution, unless you assume that “seed” could also have been translated as “DNA” and the instructions for all plant life were in the original little dot of algae. So the giant sequoia’s DNA was tucked in with the mushrooms and prickly pears. Scientist diverge from creationists saying that plants and animals evolved simultaneously, with suitable food supply coming along at the same time as each new species.
The same argument applies to the creation of animal life. Though the account says,” Having seed in itself, and God commanded them to be fruitful and multiply after their own kind and replenish the earth. I can read “after it’s own kind” as referring to the DNA and RNA instructions and if I really, really stretch, I can believe that somehow DNA instructed both male and female to evolve next to each other in the same generation and both avoided being eaten before producing MANY MANY offspring. (with an appropriate food supply nearby) But if this is the way God did it, then I’m sure He had a reason.
Believing the Bible literally,( allowing “days” to be translated “periods of time,) is the application of Occam’s Razor. (The simplest explanation is usually the best). But how do strict Biblical Creationists explain the fossil record? It shows hundreds upon hundreds of layers of animal and plant remains lain down with simplest at the bottom (oldest) and more complex and modern at the top. And how do evolutionists explain that those layers are laid down like pancakes in a stack with very little crossover between layers of species and fully functional body parts like wings appearing in one generation? That isn’t the way survival of the fittest works. Doesn’t that suggest that they were created whole?
I have heard the idea put forth that the fossil layer was debris from a previous earth. This makes no sense at all to me, because it implies that God took unorganized matter (without form and void) and arranged the bones of animals and plants in layers uniformly over the whole earth. Why would he arrange it to seem different than it really was unless he attempted to deceive us? That is contrary to the nature of God. There are other problems with this idea, but you’ll have to comment or email me.
To complicate the question even further, if there was no death until Adam partook of the fruit of knowledge of good and evil, wouldn’t all those creatures have to have been alive until that first bite? Why would they THEN die in order of complexity. The flood killing off all extinct species also doesn’t explain the orderly way the pancakes are laid down very well, unless the flood itself was a much more complex process. But Man would also be mixed in with all the other life in that event.
I reason that God had a reason for placing Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. It is possible in my mind that it was an isolated ecosystem, protected from death and harm and even discomfort. If there was no death in the realm of the Garden of Eden, outside there were thorns, thistles and predators death and sweat equity.
But all of the reasoning and questioning and debating between the sciences are forced to scrum (for those of you who don’t know rugby, the two teams lock heads and shoulders and push like crazy to dominate the ball,) over the subject of man. To evolutionists, did God let man-like creatures evolve and then when fully developed into “the image of God” pluck out a man and woman and place them in the Garden of Eden to start the human race and receive agency and have domination over all things in the earth? At what point did these creatures receive spirits? How did they live before that event if they didn’t have human spirits before?
While this is possible, scientists who study the fossil record place the dawn of man in human form back 2 million years. Adam was the first man, and Eve was the first woman. Even atheist evolutionists agree that there had to be an Adam and an Eve because of the DNA markers that trace to an individual source. (on the x chromosome) So I wish an evolution-based creationist would explain to me what happened in those 2 million years. The Bible meticulously records the genealogy of man, and is even careful to tell us what their life span was and their ages (before the flood) when their heir was born. The Bible is not ambiguous on the history of humankind. If Adam lived when the Bible said he did, and there was no human death until he left the Garden, the 2 million date for humans is way, way, way off. If you apply Biblical information to the dates of man, and then extrapolate dates for the fossil record, we recognize a tremendous condensation of time in the fossil record.
When Mt. St. Helens erupted in Washington state, hundreds of trees were washed into lakes of silica rich water. Scientists were astonished to find fossilization well advanced after only a few years. Until then, petrifaction was understood to take many many thousands of years, but St. Helens showed that it can be a very rapid process. We see a similar condensation of the time line in tree petrifaction as we do applying the Bible’s time line to human history.
But condensing the time to adhere to the Bible doesn’t explain the layers from simple to complex very well.
And using the concept of evolution giving an advantage that gives a feeding or mating advantage that is then passed to abundant offspring, won’t work in explaining why my evolutionary advantage, wasn’t passed on to any of my children. (My left thumb is shorter than my right thumb by a good half inch. It’s fully functional but I never cut it while chopping onions with my right hand, and it is shaped pleasantly for sucking on, and the fingernail is much sturdier than the others, making a convenient screwdriver.) According to Darwin, my husband should have chosen me because of my attractive thumb, or because I was so well fed because of my not cutting my thumb. But alas, he didn’t notice it until we were engaged and my mother pointed it out, and not one of my kids inherited it. Geneticists, isn’t that typical of a genetic aberration?
So I go back to the comfort and peace in the knowledge that God created the Earth. He created it for us, his children. There is only one truth, one set of facts, and God knows exactly what that truth is. I hope that he’ll inspire me or full-fledged seekers of truth in the sciences to look in the right place for that truth, but until then, (or perhaps therefore), I’m hoping that readers will comment and add to my knowledge and suggest reasoning that I have not thought of. Many of you know more about the sciences than I do and have more details to throw into the mix. Comment if you feel inspired. (Feel free to use more than one frame if the word limit is too small.) (all comments are moderated)
cool blog site
April 11, 2011I’ll soon be giving away some copies of my already published books through the site. Good Luck!
http://madmim.com
April 8, 2011If you’ve never been a gardener, now is a grand time to start. As in, finish reading this blog, click ‘follow’ and enter your email address to verify your identity just to humor me, and then go out and find a sunny little patch of earth where you can plant something. It doesn’t matter if it’s only two feet square, if you like to eat, you’ll enjoy gardening.
Now go get the shovel and turn the earth over and chop it up. If it’s a little bigger area, you might use the blade of a pick. It’s great! Unless the soil is rich and black and loose, you might want to go to Walmart and buy a sack of humus and manure. It will cost about $1.37. While you’re there, grab a couple of packets of seeds and a cheerful little tomato plant or two. (Indeterminant on the tag means the vines will trail all over the ground if you don’t prop them up. Determinent means they behave better but produce less abundantly.) The letters after the name of the plant indicate diseases they resist. If you have a humid, fungus-y disease smitten place, the more letters the better. I like Early girl and Better Boy. (I have no idea why they have such sexist names, but they should do well almost anywhere.)
Mix that sack of dirt in well. Plant the seeds in clusters and you’ll get more from the space than if you plant in a row. Allow a few inches in between the seeds and don’t plant broken seeds. Bury the tomatoes deep and tip them on their sides. Bury all but the top leaf joints under an inch or two of soil. The plant will look like it’s lying down for only a day or two, but the stem will curve toward the light and you won’t be able to tell that it was lying down. (new roots will grow along the stem and increase plant vigor It may even send up new plant shoots from the joints). Water it all well. Give it a little miracle grow or “blue koolaid” a few times as it grows. (The Store brand of 10-10-10 mixture is great) Check your garden daily. Pick off bugs and kill them. Crush tomato horned worms. Shoot the deer and rabbits and roast them on a slow spit as an example to other critters. (Ha! You think I’m kidding!)
Garden fresh produce tastes spectacular. Once you develop an appetite for it, you’ll realize that it isn’t so hard to produce. You’ll find varieties that do better than others. You’ll get exercise and sunshine.
And when all is said and done, you might, you just might, maybe need to know how to grow your own food. Now is a much better time to start than later.
Feel free to ask questions and make comments and tell all about your own garden and BY ALL MEANS GIVE ADVICE!
Now, I’m going out to harvest the asparagus.
Rave-winning salsa recipe
April 4, 2011Wednesday Wondering: Can anyone read Matt. 24, the writing of Isaiah and Malachi and not notice something?
March 30, 2011I’m also interested in Obama’s “coalition” where he brings US troops into the fray and then refuses to lead them. He calls on various other groups of “Kings of the earth” to do this. Couple this with the fact that the Iranian video released yesterday vows to “continue to stir up war against Israel in all the Arab nations as fulfillment of Muslim prophecy that before the advent of the Messiah, Israel will be destroyed.” (It’s almost the same in Hebrew and Christian prophecy except that the Messiah saves Israel at the last moment.) (See it with subtitles on drudgereport.com if you don’t speak Farsi, the language of Ahmadinejad.)
Lets see. Jesus warned us in the New Testament (Matthew 24) that right before his coming there would be: wars and rumors of wars (check) famines (check) pestilences (check) earthquakes in divers places (check) false prophets (check) iniquity abounding (check) love of many shall wax cold (check) (I heard on the radio this morning of a woman here who killed her husband and then cooked him. The radio announcers were joking about it.) The gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the world (check, with the Internet, is there a place where there is no access to the Gospel of Christ?)
Anyway, yall get the point. Prophecies dating back thousands of years are being fulfilled all around us.
But life feels pretty normal doesn’t it? How many of my dear readers assume that when things get bad, the federal govt or the Red Cross will rescue us?
The thing I’m wondering today is how do you legislate food? If Congress makes a law that says stores have to give away their wares to the hungry whether they have money or not, does that mean that Walmart will suddenly be feeding the nation?
I have some important information. You might want to share this with others. Food doesn’t come from Walmart. Food doesn’t even come from trucks. Food doesn’t come from factories.(No, Honey! Food does NOT come from McDonalds!) Food comes from the earth. It has to grow in the earth. All food on the pyramid needs water and light to grow. Did I mention that the wheat crop in OK will begin to be plowed under if we don’t get rain within a few days? Lots of rain, but not too much rain. Of course the hay crop has also failed so ranchers are deciding whether to slaughter beef while the price is still strong or change to another form of feed. They have to guess right, or the cost of food, transportation, packaging and selling will leave no profit for the farmer. If a farmer can’t profit from the killing of an animal (or the harvest of any substandard crop) no matter how badly they want to, they can’t harvest. And the Lord didn’t promise us rain, he promised us famine.
I really hate to be hungry. . .I think it’s wise to store non-perishable food. For those of you to whom this idea is novel, human’s can maintain relative good health eating a diet of grain, milk (I recommend powdered, since the other gets really nasty PDQ) salt, and a source of sugar. (It really doesn’t matter what form the sugar takes, it’s for energy and palatability). Dry beans store well and are highly nutritious and the same is true of lentils and dry split peas. Dry potatoes are good for that too.
Whether you are Christian or Jew, read the last of the old Hebrew prophets, Malachi (last in the old testament for those of you who don’t speak “Bible”) before you dismiss this information with a chuckle. Consider that Isaiah, Daniel, Malachi and Jesus Christ Himself all described our day in detail. Scoffers have ever been with us. Don’t be one of them.
Wednesday wonderings: Am I Sick?
March 23, 2011Miracles are in season Oklahoma Redbuds explode into sherbet-pink bloom this time of year and thickets of wild plum clothe themselves like angels. I’m talking about vegetables too! Last year I planted potatoes for the first time. I watered them, weeded them and finally gave up. No show. This year I bought a different variety and planted in a different place. I watered and waited a couple of weeks and then went out to visit my dirt patch. It’s a miracle! Not only are the potato chunks I planted this year up and growing, but last year’s are also! I hardly know what to make of it! You’ve heard the saying, “A watched pot never boils.” I have a new one for you. “A watched potato plant never grows.” I suspect I watched last years’ taters into complete dormancy. Question 1:Does my visiting my plants over and over in a day qualify me as insane using Einstein’s definition of “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result,”? Will anyone join me in the (garden of) the asylum?
I KNOW I’m not insane for visiting and revisting my asparagus. Perhaps I ought not to confess sins on the internet, but I do so love asparagus. And I planted it four years ago. (You have to let a bed develop for a few years before you can harvest). (And last year I supplemented the bed with an additional variety.) So when the little purpley heads popped from the ground, I gave them a couple of days. And then I ate them. In the garden. Without washing. Or sharing. I waited a few days and went back. . .and did it again. Yesterday I harvested 10 spears. I only ate one. I offered them to my family and my youngest son claimed he “LOVED” them. Alas. Question 2: Does my folly of eating the asparagus without sharing or washing become a sin, now that I know that my son enjoys it? Or, was it already a sin not to share something that is nutritious with my family over whom I have most control of diet?
Here’s another thing that I think supplies “fever” to the term “Spring fever”. Government upsets the balance between freedom and rule of law when they make me set my clocks forward and pretend that the day is longer for 2/3’s of the year? Just when we’re starting to see a little glimmer of daylight when we leave the house, some overfed bureaucrat plunges me backward into the night. Benjamin Franklin came up with the idea and also said “Early to bed and early to rise, makes a young man healthy, wealthy and wise.” Mr. Franklin, SOME of us were already getting up early before you fiddled with the national clocks! HIPOCRACY! Let’s have a national pajama day to protest “daylight savings.” If you already spend your day in flannel, do you do it to protest?
This might be the fever talking but we could also wear flannel to protest the show, “What Not to Wear.” Who are they to throw away perfectly good pink sweat pants, with a green hippy flower covering the stain on the front, or an oversized tee shirt that says, “Mama knows best?”
Lastly, when I was a child, my mom would cook up a pot of rice and serve it with sugar, butter and milk for breakfast. Yum! When the rice got tiresome, she’d crack some wheat in the wheat grinder and make a porridge. (My brothers called it “Filboid Studge” (Assonance and alliteration supply the meaning.)) But sometimes when she was REALLY feeling creative, she’d boil the whole wheat berry. It’s tasty. Kinda nutty. The consistency is similar to how I imagine little spider eggs, Chewy in a rubbery sort of way. The question I would like response to is : “Does the fact that I had a sudden craving for boiled wheat this morning, and that I’m looking forward to eating it when I finish this, suggest that I’m insane or merely stricken with the seasonal fever?
But I’m out of time. I need to go out and palpitate my irises to see which ones are going to bloom. Care to join me?
There’s a new show out called “Secret Millionaire.” I watched it on Hulu and enjoyed it … with one reservation, but we’ll get to that. The premise for this reality show is that a millionaire who is not famous goes into some American city and scopes out the opportunity for volunteering. The producers must line this up in advance. While there, they dress to blend in and live in some little place in the neighborhood. They go to various non profit organizations and volunteer for a day and at the end of the week, they give out $100,000 or so of their own money. Apparently, they set their own priorities of which group will get what, based on which gives the most bang for the buck.
The part of the show that I love is seeing humble, invisible people giving their lives in the service of others. In the premier, we met twin sisters who run a soup kitchen but serve up fantastic home-cooked meals. Another group collects unused and unneeded musical instruments, and trains under-privileged kids to play them. Several of their students were going on to musical careers and had hope and promise of a bright future. Another group decorates bedrooms for dangerously ill children. The second show showed us a neighborhood patrol, a second chance for high school drop outs that rebuilds inner city Detroit, and a dialysis patient who organizes rides for other dialysis patients. He said that often patients have to wait hours before someone can pick them up from the center.
The fun of the show is deciding how much I would give to each of those organization and which one has the most impact. The cool thing is that when the millionaire gives them his personal checks and states the amount, they almost invariably say, “You have no idea how many people we can help with this money,” or “Now we can do such and such for so and so.”
I also note the effect it has on me. It turns my thoughts to how I can help.I find that I identify more with those volunteers in the community that were doing what they do before the cameras got there.(Maybe because I’m not a millionaire) I want to reach out and make a difference. Can it be that network TV has come up with a show that inspires viewers to be more like Jesus? Can it be that there is truly no underlying diabolical motive for airing this show? Next week I’m going to pay more attention to who the advertisers are and see who benefits financially from this show.
My only reservation about this show is the charge Jesus gave against doing “alms before men.” He said public givers who sound a trumpet, (or roll a camera) have their reward. But then again, when I’m a better person for having watched the show, does the good outweigh the drawback of publicity? Is there a time and place for publicity in alms-giving? Is it appropriately handled in this instance? I’ll be interested to see what you all (that’s ya’ll to us Southerners) think on this subject. If you can, watch Secret Millionaire on Hulu http://www.hulu.com/watch/223330/secret-millionair